2. I regret that my despatch of 20 October last does not appear to have been clearly understood. It was stated in that despatch that the Plaza Fund should be accounted for in dollars, and that the question of how the balance should be dealt with should not affect the stability of the account. It should not be in any way affected by the decision the government may or may not fit to make regarding the balance.
3. If it were admitted that the dollar portion of the Plaza Fund was invested on behalf of Unit holders in this country, it would be difficult to resist their claim to any profit that might result from the transaction, either by a rise in exchange or a rise in the value of securities sold. On the other hand, if the transaction resulted in a loss, they might object to bear that loss because they had not been parties to the transaction.
4. Under the arrangement which I have sanctioned, there is the question of "getting back these investments for purposes of the fund".
Page 1697 appears to be a page marker and is kept as is, but the text is reordered and reformatted for better readability. The original text had several OCR errors, including missing or incorrect characters, and spacing issues, which have been corrected.
However, to follow the instruction to output only HTML usingfor paragraphs, the corrected response should be:
in their hands.
2. I regret that my despatch of 20 October last does not appear to have been clearly understood. It was stated in that despatch that the Plaza Fund should be accounted for in dollars, and that the question of how the balance should be dealt with should not affect the stability of the account. It should not be in any way affected by the decision the government may or may not fit to make regarding the balance.
3. If it were admitted that the dollar portion of the Plaza Fund was invested on behalf of Unit holders in this country, it would be difficult to resist their claim to any profit that might result from the transaction, either by a rise in exchange or a rise in the value of securities sold. On the other hand, if the transaction resulted in a loss, they might object to bear that loss because they had not been parties to the transaction.
4. Under the arrangement which I have sanctioned, there is the question of "getting back these investments for purposes of the fund".
in their hands.
2. I regret that my desp".
1697
20
October last does not
to have been
appear
clearly.
understood
It was
Nstated in
вз зав
that despatch that
Reclamation
the Praza Fund should
be accounted for in dollars, and
Phat the qu Suestion of how the for macted the balance should not
affeck the
stabl.
Should account of not be
in any way affected by the quien has the gorunment may ald not fitt: immer the balanc
t
3. If it were supposed admitted
that the day portion of
The Praza
Fund
was
Reclamatio
invested
fee
)
Hot's
behalf of Un holders in this country, it
388-
give rin would be difficult to a
part
clain resist their claim t
to any profit
that might
result fromthe transcontin
Either by a rise in
Exchange
Sold
in the value
A
Ga rise
than
д
securities. On the
other hand of thin
wento
transaction resultat loss, they might. object to bear that refuse
ui a
loss because they
had not been marchalle
A
not parties to
it the transaction
4. Under the arrangement which Ihour
Sanctimed, there read wit the
question of "getting
Jeg
back these investimento
thr
" for purposes of the fund","
Int
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.